Difference is that you have faith, I have facts.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Übermenschİ at southcity- on May 02, 2004 at 14:52:22:

In Reply to: that headline says it all posted by 44986 on May 02, 2004 at 13:46:05:

These facts have been rigorously tested and the theory of evolution fits these facts.

You, on the other hand, have faith. Faith is the absence of facts. Creationism has absolutely zero scientific merit because it makes no predictions and cannot be tested--therefore it is afactual. By choosing creationism over results garnered by the scientific method, you are engaging in willful ignorance and intellectual dishonesty.

You may argue that belief in science is no less "religious" than belief in religion itself. Defined by the American Heritage dictionary, science is, "the observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena." Science can only be considered religious if you also consider trust in one's senses to be religious.

Finally, I reiterate--there is no evidence which disproves evolution.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup




Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]