Posted by tomkinite at 24.215.45.238 on June 13, 2002 at 16:25:24:
In Reply to: Re: sean. posted by sean on June 13, 2002 at 15:59:41:
Dude, you just want to be "right". If you want a pat on the head from Kevin Smith that bad then just say so.
: Yes, but your convoluted opinion changes from post to post, mostly just to suit whatever you want to say in response to the person you're responding to. You started off with "Don't use J.Lo because she sucks and all your fans will abandon you", then changed it to "Well, I would never not like a Kevin movie, but plenty of people will." I'm curious as to what you'll come up with next.
I think your strong generalization is a little unbecoming.
: : If you have to climb through 3 months of messages JUST to post a simple opinion, then obviously someone has missed the point.
: And you missed my point -- a point, i might add, that's not among the points in the post that you're responding to. But, then, you didn't respond to any of those. What I said was that they don't have to climb through three months of messages. They can pick any board at random and see any number of posts saying exactly that. Hell, there oughta be a second board just for J.Lo related posts. You yourself tracked down the Kevin J.Lo post, so you clearly *did* go through at least some boards, and you still ignored the fact that your opinion has been well-represented and dis-regarded all over the place.
Buddy, had you read my messages you might have clued into the fact that this is my *first* day here. For fuck sakes. That "post" you refer to was linked directly from viewaskew.com. I don't understand what vast technological knowledge one must own in order to figure out that I can see one message without perusing half the board.
: : Refute all you want, but jumping on anyone with a different view point isn't only incredibly insulting your own intelligence, it also deviates other possibly great conversations for the sake of your own dumbass remarks.
: What great conversation? Has there ever in the history of the world been a 'great conversation' about Jennifer Lopez? Post about something worth talking about and people will talk to you.
Another strong generalization. ANY conversation! Where did I indicate strictly J.Lo conversations? Never. This board just *might* be repetitive because no one is allowed to post anything without formal approval. Fuck guy, it takes you less time to convince a girl to blow your horn than it does to research and then post on this board. And you know for yourself that's sad.
: : I'm sure Kevin has no problem with constructive criticism.
: I know for a fact that he doesn't. You didn't provide him with one whiff, not even one hint, of constructive criticism.
Well, it's good your speaking for him. Wouldn't want anyone to have their own brain on anything.
: : Relax. Its a message board. Fuck.
: Trust me, I didn't have to be angry (which, if you can't read between the lines, I wasn't and am not) to see you as an idiot. You've been flooding this thread with the same bullshit from the beginning and yet to make a single point. Oh, except that we're not positive people when it comes to suffering fools gladly.
I think my point was clear. Had it not have been, you wouldn't of cited my many posts clearly relating to J.Lo. I could sit here and write a paragraph of behaviour modifications for you to make, but I really shouldn't have to.
You ARE getting upset over this thread, otherwise a reply wouldn't be needed. In that sense, it can be said that I may be upset. I wouldn't say upset, rather disturbed. Reply all you want, to get that rewarding pat on the head. But don't expect a reply from me. I think its obvious I've wasted far too much time arguing, instead of discussing -- the original purpose of a message board.
Nick