Re: Mutually exclusive? Nah...


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Narcissist at gw1.mcgraw-hill.com on September 06, 2001 at 13:21:53:

In Reply to: Mutually exclusive? Nah... posted by Renaissance Man on September 06, 2001 at 13:07:04:

>>he's still as queer as can be. What? Can't a man get a little freaky with a flamboyant black man without suddenly being labeled as 'queer'?

I believe Banky to be bisexual. Which one he truly PREFERS is anyone's guess. He's either: a) been repressing his homosexuality for quite a long time b) decided to open up his mind (and other things) and experiment with the boundaries of his sexuality...

Either way- good for him.

Sex is a GLORIOUS experience. Whenever a person surrenders themselves to the will of the flesh (without any nagging voices)- I do a little happy dance. This, of course, comes with the consenting adults qualifier where NO ONE (first, second, or third parties) is being hurt. I believe everyone should cross over at least once. (otherwise you really will NEVER know...).

But yes, I think Holden and Banky were *just* friends. However, we should never underestimate how powerful and intimate a friendship can be. Sometimes the relationship can be so intense that there's just no going back once the it has been altered by either actions or circumstance...

Amy





Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

E-Mail/Userid:
Password:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


  


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]