Underperformed? According to WHOM?

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by GoShawty*Its ya Birthday* at sb2insgproxy3.dowjones.com on April 30, 2004 at 14:27:53:

In Reply to: Done licking my wounds posted by Kevin on April 30, 2004 at 13:39:16:

: So the movie under-performed, and I've been moping around about it for the last few weeks. I'm over it now. Fuck it - at least we weren't "Gigli". Onward and upward.

--You've been saying all along that you're less concerned with
Box Office than with people actually liking the movie and taking
meaning from it. Well we can safely say it "performed" that!
Even Larry King said, "If you don't like it, you don't have a pulse" and
I think of him as a serious news personality rather than a gossipy type.
As in he's not faddish.
Long post short, I can understand your disappointment in a perceived
underperformance if you're listening to certain heads of certain companies.
But if you're staying true to what you intended to do, you should be happy.

: Big changes lie ahead in not only this board's future, but my future as well. More on that when I
: can tell you.

--Again with this schtick?

: Heading to Alaska this weekend for a college gig, but when I get back, I'll be in full swing on this
: motherfucker.

: Meantime, I know I'm a little late, but wasn't "Kill Bill, Vol. 2" just fantastic?

--Didn't see it.
Is that taboo on this board ?

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup




Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]