Posted by Runshouse21 at 68-173-193-219.nyc.rr.com on May 02, 2004 at 14:27:14:
In Reply to: Re: that headline says it all posted by 44986 on May 02, 2004 at 14:23:33:
:
: : : I don't want to argue the point anymore, but that article has a bias. I'm not saying I don't, because I do, but it's hard to argue something unless you have well learned people on both sides, not just a lot of people who have their own thoughts of how things are who have read a lot of articles or a lot of Bible passages. It's like politics. If we say to only use solar power, then other energy producing companies will no longer have jobs. finding proof for or against evolution changes a lot of people's lives in too big of ways. I found Creationism to be what I believe in and it has yet to be refuted for me.
: : Maybe its a difference in what people need. See I need proof.. Creationalism has none and evolution has pleanty. If you flip that evolution has no solid disproof but niether does creationilism.
: : Different strokes... but as the line in dogma goes there are leaps of faith and just plain gullablity
: and what do you think Dogma made you think more about?
: Faith in God?
: or the possibility that there isn't One?
Out of those two choices i would think "Faith in god" but i always believed in one.