Posted by WebInFront at 64.203.195.249 on March 24, 2004 at 03:15:29:
In Reply to: read my post below... posted by MasterdeBater774 on March 24, 2004 at 01:49:52:
:
: : : but i did find this to be a little bit different.
:
: : And that's the problem. You saw that website as something other than folding tricks. It's not any different. Its actually worse because it poses as something credible and in fact implicitly points fingers. If you saw that website as something other than smoke and mirrors then that really really raises questions in my mind about your analytical skills. That sounds harsh, but I'm serious about this. If you don't see that as wild accusations and instead see facts, then that concerns me.
: What i meant by it's a little bit different is the fact that it showed different pictures and that caught my attention and wasn't how fucking Amsterdam predicted this 400 years ago. I mean yea someone could do that with photo edit but they are an eye grabber. did i say i believe everything this guy said? no.