Posted by Krickett at 209.161.240.133 on October 20, 2003 at 01:18:32:
In Reply to: No, it really is... posted by MasterdeBater774 on October 20, 2003 at 01:08:37:
: look at the events and timelines that wars, and other events took place. Jewish people did a very accurate job in recording events down (it matches up with a lot of other evidence), that's not based on religion it's pure fact. The bible has been rewritten many times but the basics events are the same.
I'll agree that SOME events were depicted truthfully, but how can it be a true accurate account if not all events are represented? That's what I'm saying. They've been cut & pasted too much to even be considered accurately.
Take for instance the concept of not eating meat on fridays...it's not because it's "unholy" as the bible would have you believe. It was because in that day & age, plague & disease was running rampant in those parts of the world(which we still see in this day & age) so not eating meat was only to control their death total...
The Dead Sea Scrolls are a true account of Jesus' teachings, but the catholic church would denounce those as quickly as they do the female goddess. Problem is now, people are so sick & tired of being told what to do & what to fear...no one even wants to practice religion anymore.
So being that the bible is a true account...why do you suppose they don't want to add the Scrolls to the true testament? Because it totally contradicts all their teachings, and since their faith is based on Jesus Christ's teachings...why would they want to prove themselves false?