Posted by weirdninja at host217-44-183-125.range217-44.btcentralplus.com on August 22, 2003 at 15:34:31:
In Reply to: catholic dogma posted by weirdninja on August 22, 2003 at 15:16:27:
: ok if dogmatic law is taken as the theoretical truths about god (and his teachings, etc)
: how can john stuart mill be right when he writes "anything which is not held open to full dicussion and debate becomes dogmatic" (without meaning)
: or is he basing his arguement on the dogmatic law being without meaning BECAUSE it was not discussed openly and debated AT ALL for many centuries
:
: thoughts???
: (and for the cocksuckers who were about to slam me for being irrelevant...go back and watch dogma again)
is that better???