sequels are NEVER nessesary EVER *nt

Posted by oldangelmidnight at hse-montreal-ppp101223.qc.sympatico.ca on August 21, 2003 at 10:09:41:

In Reply to: Big Trouble in Little China posted by Lithmick on August 21, 2003 at 10:04:20:

: So this was one of those $10 DVD's I picked up at Best Buy the other day. Love this movie. I did however, hear a bizarre rumor that they were going to try to make a sequel - has anybody heard anything about this? It's a fun movie and everything - but does it necessitate a sequel?

Follow Ups:

• how about The Godfather? *nt* spider_boris 12:22:10 8/21/03 (1)
  • that was a sequel? [nt] Xtian 12:38:49 8/21/03 (0)
• What about trilogys? Queen of Urban Legend 10:24:43 8/21/03 (2)
  • Er, wait... Queen of Urban Legend 10:30:07 8/21/03 (1)
    • Re: Er, wait... Xtian 10:32:13 8/21/03 (0)
• I disagree... Lithmick 10:24:11 8/21/03 (0)
• So Two Towers & Return of the King are not needed? Übermenschİ 10:21:45 8/21/03 (5)
  • those aren't technically sequells oldangelmidnight 10:24:32 8/21/03 (2)
    • Don't even lecture me on Tolkien. Übermenschİ 10:29:11 8/21/03 (1)
      • no no no The Bastard 10:35:15 8/21/03 (0)
  • Those aren't sequels... The Bastard 10:22:55 8/21/03 (0)
  • Re: So Two Towers & Return of the King are not nee Xtian 10:22:53 8/21/03 (0)
• what about Rocky 2 and 3? The Bastard 10:12:27 8/21/03 (0)

Post a Followup