Posted by shitty speller...DEAL WITH IT! at 66-214-245-137.gln-eres.charterpipeline.net on July 05, 2003 at 20:19:23:
In Reply to: Poll-----Sequels posted by Hopelessly Hooked on July 05, 2003 at 20:12:15:
: i personally find sequels and even trilogys to be a let down when compared to their originals. however sometimes they can actually be pretty damn funny and just plain entertaining. here's a poll for ya.
: Rate on a scale from 1 -10
:
: Fast & Furious ---- 7
: 2 Fast 2 Furious ------ NA
: Waynes World 9
: waynes World 2 9
: Legally Blond 5
: Legally Blond 2 NA
: Charlie's Angels 8
: Charlie's Angels 2 0 (fuck, it doesn't even deserve 1)
: Austin Powers 1 8
: " " 2 7
: " " 3 8
:
: Star Wars Original trilogy(as a whole) 10
: Star Wars Prequels (Not individually as a whole) 7-8
: MiB 1 8
: MIB 2 2
: Dumb and Dumber 9
: " " 2 NA
: Ace Ventura 8
: Ace Ventura 2 7
: Matrix 8
: Matrix Reloaded 10
: MIssion impossible 8
: MIssion impossible 2 9
: Which sequel (currently in production) are u most looking foward 2?
SHREK 2 ALL THE WAY
: What movie should never have had a sequel or even an original?
LEGALLY BLONDE
: What movie would u like to see a sequel to?
FINDING NEMO
: Sequels overall -
: a) a good idea or
: b)just a way for movie makers to make $$$
DEPENDS. MOST SEQUALS ARE JUST TO MAKE MONEY, BUT I ENJOY A GOOD DEAL OF THEM USUALLY. SOME MOVIES, (STAR WARS, GODFATHER, MATRIX) REALLY TAKE UP 3 MOVIES TO TELL A SINGLE STORY. THOSE, USUALLY, MAKE THE BEST SEQUALS.
: ~Hopelessly Hooked