Hey Josh

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by 123forever at aca19040.ipt.aol.com on January 15, 2002 at 19:58:05:

In Reply to: Is money a failing grade? posted by Darth Dobbin on January 15, 2002 at 19:51:12:

did you read my post located five posts below, or did you also come to this comparison on your own?

: But if you use money as your gauge, then it made $30 (and thus shows profit, even before video and foriegn markets), for being, in essence, a near-absurdist arthouse flick. That's almost as impressive as a $30 by a movie which was a religious hot-potato, enmeshed in controversy, with limited and screwy distribution which features a rubber poop monster, and trash-talking angels. Both are impressive achievements for very personal, offbeat, non-"hollywood" tales.

: Also, judging by your criterion of money, JURASSIC PARK:LOST WORLD was a smashing success.

: Which would YOU rather watch?

Follow Ups:

No, I didn't read your post. Did you make the same Darth Dobbin 20:00:36 1/15/02 (1)
- Brother Josh 123forever 20:05:52 1/15/02 (0)

Post a Followup

E-Mail/Userid:
Password:

Subject:

Comments:
: did you read my post located five posts below, or did you also come to this comparison on your own? : : But if you use money as your gauge, then it made $30 (and thus shows profit, even before video and foriegn markets), for being, in essence, a near-absurdist arthouse flick. That's almost as impressive as a $30 by a movie which was a religious hot-potato, enmeshed in controversy, with limited and screwy distribution which features a rubber poop monster, and trash-talking angels. Both are impressive achievements for very personal, offbeat, non-"hollywood" tales. : : Also, judging by your criterion of money, JURASSIC PARK:LOST WORLD was a smashing success. : : Which would YOU rather watch? : :

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]