Posted by ebass420 at 64.210.7.34 on December 19, 2001 at 15:23:31:
In Reply to: right posted by Nitram (aka Moon Raper) on December 19, 2001 at 15:10:29:
It was Originally Kubricks film, potzer. he had been cultivating it for only gee...fifteen fucking years or so. The only reason Speilberg got his chubby money grubbing fingers in it is becuase Stanley died. And I confess I did see it, I was ashamed at having spent eight bucks on something I normally owuldn't even piss on. And the only reason I DID was becuase of Kubricks involvement.
and thanks for the dreamcather info