his post WAS deviod of meaning

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by ghostmann at 63.162.217.23 on December 21, 2001 at 11:33:28:

In Reply to: there's really no need to flame someone . . . posted by Russbound on December 21, 2001 at 11:27:24:

but then so are most of mine

well then consider yourself flamed. Russbound 11:47:48 12/21/01 (11)
- can you repeat that please? ghostmann 11:50:13 12/21/01 (10)
  - He said. Hov 11:53:30 12/21/01 (9)
    - I know what's going on... Stormin Norman 11:58:56 12/21/01 (8)
      - where's the newbie? *nt Russbound 12:28:28 12/21/01 (3)
        
        ::points at Ghostmann:: there, write there....*NT* Hov 12:35:02 12/21/01 (2)
        
        im not a newbie - act one ghostmann 12:40:40 12/21/01 (1)
        
        Re: im not a newbie - act one Thè £ºkî 14:36:01 12/21/01 (0)
      - you talkin' to me? you talkin' to me? you talkin' ghostmann 12:05:05 12/21/01 (3)
        
        I was talking to the newbies.... Stormin Norman 12:24:08 12/21/01 (2)
        
        having a drink - act one ghostmann 12:34:23 12/21/01 (0)
        
        I believe the correct wording is... Hov 12:29:11 12/21/01 (0)

Post a Followup