Fucking AOL again...

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Kevin at spider-mtc-te043.proxy.aol.com on November 29, 2001 at 02:08:39:

In Reply to: Not so, Toads posted by Kevin on November 29, 2001 at 02:04:38:

For some reasons, the quotes from the emails were left out of the post.
I'm putting them back where they were supposed to be in my post above.

: : * i admitted i used poor judgement and made a mistake

: But that's in the post above. You said...

"I'll accept that it was poor judgement, but again, the two boards have
always had different standards, and I ask to you to at least consider my
point of view."

: See - it wasn't omitted at all.

---------------------

: you also left out:
: * the multiple times where you called me a liar

No, Toads - everything I ever emailed you on the subject is represented in
that post above. I never used the term "liar". As can be read in the
lengthy post above, I said...

"Your logic is either assinine, or you're willfully trying to deceive me.
Which is it?"

And...

"I don't think you're being honest here at all, and it offends me."

And...

"Is THIS person full of shit, or are you?"

And...

"C'mon, Toads - you CAN'T be that naive. You were fucking around and you
got caught. If that's NOT the case, then you're a liability to have in my
employ."

All of the above comments IMPLY I felt you were lying, but I never call you
a liar. It may be a small point of semantics, but you raised it, so I've
addressed it.

If you can produce an email in which I actually call you a "liar", please,
PLEASE post it. I'll gladly correct myself before the board.

However, those emails to you I posted were all the emails on the subject I
ever sent to you. And after carefully going over them again, at no point
did I call you a liar, or even...

: * where you called me lazy

I didn't call you lazy. I said, as, again, you can read in the post
above...

"So, basically, laze was a factor? Another attribute I don't accept in an
employee."

: but hey, everyone's free to make up their own mind about the situation.

: ******************
: *******************
: ********************
: *********************
: *******

Follow Ups:

Missing posts DiMono 16:05:32 11/29/01 (0)
Damn. I thought you were puposely leaving them out thx3188 02:29:27 11/29/01 (0)
like i said HolyToads 02:21:33 11/29/01 (10)
- Re: like i said Kevin 02:42:09 11/29/01 (9)
  - Re: like i said HolyToads 03:08:46 11/29/01 (8)
    - Re: like i said DiMono 16:13:49 11/29/01 (0)
    - Words hurt? Isis 09:30:07 11/29/01 (4)
      - Re: Words hurt? Dragoncub 14:11:41 11/29/01 (3)
        
        I completely agree with you... Isis 16:39:52 11/29/01 (2)
        
        I see you wisely stayed out of this Silverking 16:55:31 11/29/01 (0)
        
        ohhhhhh... Dragoncub 16:54:13 11/29/01 (0)
    - Re: like i said SheRa 04:21:17 11/29/01 (1)
      - But...but... SunViking 08:39:14 11/29/01 (0)
in all fairness... LD 02:15:04 11/29/01 (5)
- Re: in all fairness... Kevin 02:36:18 11/29/01 (0)
- In all reality... CoachPants 02:24:30 11/29/01 (2)
  - someone needs a reality check Libra 02:40:43 11/29/01 (1)
    - We're both clever on how we played off the previou CoachPants 17:08:46 11/29/01 (0)
- For Pete's sake, would you PLEASE just butt out of it? NT Pitstain 02:19:07 11/29/01 (0)

Post a Followup

E-Mail/Userid:
Password:

Subject:

Comments:
: For some reasons, the quotes from the emails were left out of the post. : I'm putting them back where they were supposed to be in my post above. : : : * i admitted i used poor judgement and made a mistake : : But that's in the post above. You said... : "I'll accept that it was poor judgement, but again, the two boards have : always had different standards, and I ask to you to at least consider my : point of view." : : See - it wasn't omitted at all. : --------------------- : : you also left out: : : * the multiple times where you called me a liar : No, Toads - everything I ever emailed you on the subject is represented in : that post above. I never used the term "liar". As can be read in the : lengthy post above, I said... : "Your logic is either assinine, or you're willfully trying to deceive me. : Which is it?" : And... : "I don't think you're being honest here at all, and it offends me." : And... : "Is THIS person full of shit, or are you?" : And... : "C'mon, Toads - you CAN'T be that naive. You were fucking around and you : got caught. If that's NOT the case, then you're a liability to have in my : employ." : All of the above comments IMPLY I felt you were lying, but I never call you : a liar. It may be a small point of semantics, but you raised it, so I've : addressed it. : If you can produce an email in which I actually call you a "liar", please, : PLEASE post it. I'll gladly correct myself before the board. : However, those emails to you I posted were all the emails on the subject I : ever sent to you. And after carefully going over them again, at no point : did I call you a liar, or even... : : * where you called me lazy : I didn't call you lazy. I said, as, again, you can read in the post : above... : "So, basically, laze was a factor? Another attribute I don't accept in an : employee." : : but hey, everyone's free to make up their own mind about the situation. : : ****************** : : ******************* : : ******************** : : ********************* : : *******

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]