is it me, or is Roger Ebert not too bright?

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by metetron at spider-mtc-tg073.proxy.aol.com on August 24, 2001 at 19:48:14:

well, granted he gave JSBSB a good review, but his historical facts need to be updated. Rock didnt play an angel in dogma, and from what i saw from the sneak peek of JSBSB, our stoner friends spoke to Brodie Bruce in the comic book store, not Banky Edwards. Now I know if i was reviewing a movie, which unfortunately i am not paid to do, i would have my facts straight, heads up Roger.

an interesting Post Script to that story,
after reading Ebert's review i saw the sneak peek, and went 2 times today already....(its 6:50pm central time) and i am going again. the fact that Kevin is my idol has only a mild part to do with it. the movie just rules.

Follow Ups:

Re: is it me, or is Roger Ebert not too bright? Amazing Colossal Puma Man 00:08:42 8/25/01 (0)
He did the same thing in his Mallrats review. Amazing Bluntman 19:56:51 8/24/01 (0)
Re: is it me, or is Roger Ebert not too bright? Jack_Sully 19:56:21 8/24/01 (0)

Post a Followup

E-Mail/Userid:
Password:

Subject:

Comments:
: well, granted he gave JSBSB a good review, but his historical facts need to be updated. Rock didnt play an angel in dogma, and from what i saw from the sneak peek of JSBSB, our stoner friends spoke to Brodie Bruce in the comic book store, not Banky Edwards. Now I know if i was reviewing a movie, which unfortunately i am not paid to do, i would have my facts straight, heads up Roger. : an interesting Post Script to that story, : after reading Ebert's review i saw the sneak peek, and went 2 times today already....(its 6:50pm central time) and i am going again. the fact that Kevin is my idol has only a mild part to do with it. the movie just rules.

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The View Askew WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]