Posted by perch at webcacheb02a.cache.pol.co.uk on October 07, 2000 at 12:36:11:
In Reply to: Here we go, Number 10. posted by maxim401 on October 07, 2000 at 09:02:32:
: No, Mallrats had stuff in there just because (see Suzanne). Dogma was an affair of the heart from Kevin, and everything had it's place. And as far as the attitude of Clerks, Kevin really wanted to make that movie, so I don't see how it had that attitude. Unless you mean from Randal.
>>>> Of course it had attitude, How many other debut films have a girl fucking a dead guy or a scene about sucking your own dick. I'm not talking about the attitude of the charecters in the film, I'm talking about the "couldn't give a fuck attitude" of Kevin. He knew what he wanted to be in the film and stuck with it. Those scenes would of made it a difficult film to sell to the likes of Universal and Polygram, but he didn't cut them or try to mould the film to suit the suits. That was the attitude I was referring to.
: That would be your basic bullshit. VA5 will be the last Askewniverse film, but won't really be tied to any of the previous 4 flicks. Although, I guess technically, all of Kevin's movies are followups to Dogma now, loosely speaking, eh?
>>>> I don't mean to be pedantic, but didn't the ending credits on Dogma state we'll next see Jay and Silent Bob in Mallrats 2?